Head to head · 2026 ALDS batting

Jonathan Aranda vs Jazz Chisholm Jr.

In 2026 Jonathan Aranda has been worth 0.4 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Opponents in the 2026 ALDS, where the Tampa Bay Rays won 3-0 over the New York Yankees.

Jonathan Aranda TB

Jazz Chisholm Jr.NYY

Postseason

Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.

2026 ALDS.
Statistic	Jonathan Aranda	Jazz Chisholm Jr.
G	3	3
PA	13	9
H	4	0
HR	1	0
RBI	2	0
BB	0	1
SO	0	2
SB	0	2
AVG	.333	.000
OBP	.385	.111
SLG	.583	.000
OPS	.968	.111

Every published postseason, batting, summed with the rates recomputed from the counts.
Statistic	Jonathan Aranda	Jazz Chisholm Jr.
G	15	28
PA	60	111
H	13	17
HR	1	3
RBI	5	3
BB	2	10
SO	10	25
SB	0	10
AVG	.241	.172
OBP	.305	.255
SLG	.315	.283
OPS	.620	.537

2026 season

2026 batting. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	Jonathan Aranda	Jazz Chisholm Jr.
G	155	136
PA	668	532
H	159	109
HR	22	19
RBI	92	55
SB	0	41
AVG	.274	.231
OBP	.358	.312
SLG	.434	.399
OPS	.792	.711
ISO	.160	.168
BB%	10.3%	10.5%
K%	24.4%	29.5%
wOBA	.350	.314
wRC+	122	94
WAR	2.8	2.4

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the season table.
Statistic	Jonathan Aranda	Jazz Chisholm Jr.
G	369	711
PA	1,423	2,877
H	341	631
2B	64	95
3B	1	19
HR	46	127
RBI	184	363
BB	143	253
SO	356	805
SB	0	171
AVG	.274	.245
SLG	.438	.444
WAR	6.3	16.6

Jonathan Aranda’s full profile →Jazz Chisholm Jr.’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Jonathan Aranda vs

Jazz Chisholm Jr. vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.