Head to head · 2026 ALDS batting
Jazz Chisholm Jr. vs Victor Mesa Jr.
In 2026 Jazz Chisholm Jr. has been worth 1.0 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.
Postseason
Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.
| Statistic | Jazz Chisholm Jr. | Victor Mesa Jr. |
|---|---|---|
| G | 3 | 3 |
| PA | 9 | 11 |
| H | 0 | 2 |
| HR | 0 | 1 |
| RBI | 0 | 2 |
| BB | 1 | 1 |
| SO | 2 | 4 |
| SB | 2 | 1 |
| AVG | .000 | .200 |
| OBP | .111 | .273 |
| SLG | .000 | .500 |
| OPS | .111 | .773 |
| Statistic | Jazz Chisholm Jr. | Victor Mesa Jr. |
|---|---|---|
| G | 28 | 14 |
| PA | 111 | 48 |
| H | 17 | 6 |
| HR | 3 | 1 |
| RBI | 3 | 2 |
| BB | 10 | 5 |
| SO | 25 | 17 |
| SB | 10 | 2 |
| AVG | .172 | .140 |
| OBP | .255 | .229 |
| SLG | .283 | .209 |
| OPS | .537 | .438 |
2026 season
| Statistic | Jazz Chisholm Jr. | Victor Mesa Jr. |
|---|---|---|
| G | 136 | 74 |
| PA | 532 | 262 |
| H | 109 | 60 |
| HR | 19 | 14 |
| RBI | 55 | 34 |
| SB | 41 | 9 |
| AVG | .231 | .255 |
| OBP | .312 | .323 |
| SLG | .399 | .489 |
| OPS | .711 | .812 |
| ISO | .168 | .234 |
| BB% | 10.5% | 8.8% |
| K% | 29.5% | 20.2% |
| wOBA | .314 | .352 |
| wRC+ | 94 | 123 |
| WAR | 2.4 | 1.4 |
Career
Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.
| Statistic | Jazz Chisholm Jr. | Victor Mesa Jr. |
|---|---|---|
| G | 711 | 88 |
| PA | 2,877 | 300 |
| H | 631 | 66 |
| 2B | 95 | 9 |
| 3B | 19 | 3 |
| HR | 127 | 15 |
| RBI | 363 | 40 |
| BB | 253 | 28 |
| SO | 805 | 58 |
| SB | 171 | 9 |
| AVG | .245 | .247 |
| SLG | .444 | .472 |
| WAR | 16.6 | 1.5 |
More head to heads
The same seasons, measured against somebody else.
wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.