Head to head · 2026 ALCS batting
Jonathan Aranda vs José Ramírez
In 2026 Jonathan Aranda has been worth 1.0 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.
Postseason
Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.
| Statistic | Jonathan Aranda | José Ramírez |
|---|---|---|
| G | 6 | 6 |
| PA | 27 | 26 |
| H | 5 | 7 |
| HR | 0 | 0 |
| RBI | 3 | 1 |
| BB | 1 | 3 |
| SO | 5 | 2 |
| SB | 0 | 2 |
| AVG | .217 | .304 |
| OBP | .308 | .385 |
| SLG | .217 | .304 |
| OPS | .525 | .689 |
| Statistic | Jonathan Aranda | José Ramírez |
|---|---|---|
| G | 15 | 56 |
| PA | 60 | 238 |
| H | 13 | 52 |
| HR | 1 | 6 |
| RBI | 5 | 27 |
| BB | 2 | 27 |
| SO | 10 | 39 |
| SB | 0 | 5 |
| AVG | .241 | .250 |
| OBP | .305 | .336 |
| SLG | .315 | .399 |
| OPS | .620 | .735 |
2026 season
| Statistic | Jonathan Aranda | José Ramírez |
|---|---|---|
| G | 155 | 124 |
| PA | 668 | 544 |
| H | 159 | 111 |
| HR | 22 | 12 |
| RBI | 92 | 53 |
| SB | 0 | 37 |
| AVG | .274 | .235 |
| OBP | .358 | .320 |
| SLG | .434 | .368 |
| OPS | .792 | .688 |
| ISO | .160 | .133 |
| BB% | 10.3% | 11.0% |
| K% | 24.4% | 12.7% |
| wOBA | .350 | .303 |
| wRC+ | 122 | 89 |
| WAR | 2.8 | 1.8 |
Career
Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.
| Statistic | Jonathan Aranda | José Ramírez |
|---|---|---|
| G | 369 | 1,715 |
| PA | 1,423 | 7,303 |
| H | 341 | 1,779 |
| 2B | 64 | 425 |
| 3B | 1 | 43 |
| HR | 46 | 297 |
| RBI | 184 | 1,002 |
| BB | 143 | 726 |
| SO | 356 | 871 |
| SB | 0 | 324 |
| AVG | .274 | .276 |
| SLG | .438 | .494 |
| WAR | 6.3 | 55.3 |
More head to heads
The same seasons, measured against somebody else.
wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.

