Head to head · 2025 batting

Tyler Fitzgerald vs Blake Perkins

In 2025 Blake Perkins has been worth 0.2 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Tyler Fitzgerald SF

Blake Perkins MIL

2025 batting. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	Tyler Fitzgerald	Blake Perkins
G	69	48
PA	243	171
H	47	35
HR	4	3
RBI	14	19
SB	9	7
AVG	.217	.226
OBP	.278	.298
SLG	.327	.348
OPS	.606	.647
ISO	.111	.123
BB%	7.0%	8.8%
K%	28.8%	27.5%
wOBA	.271	.289
wRC+	70	84
WAR	0.1	0.3

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2015 begins at 2015, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the table above.
Statistic	Tyler Fitzgerald	Blake Perkins
G	169	264
PA	618	874
H	142	172
2B	31	32
3B	3	4
HR	21	14
RBI	53	93
BB	41	90
SO	188	223
SB	28	38
AVG	.252	.223
SLG	.430	.330
WAR	3.6	1.6

Tyler Fitzgerald’s full profile →Blake Perkins’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Tyler Fitzgerald vs

Blake Perkins vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.