Head to head · 2026 batting

Randy Arozarena vs Julio Rodríguez

In 2026 Randy Arozarena has been worth 2.7 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Teammates: two of the 3 most valuable hitters on the 2026 Seattle Mariners.

Randy Arozarena SEA

Julio Rodríguez SEA

2026 season

2026 batting. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	Randy Arozarena	Julio Rodríguez
G	154	150
PA	670	654
H	161	147
HR	26	22
RBI	79	71
SB	26	22
AVG	.281	.247
OBP	.381	.307
SLG	.484	.401
OPS	.865	.708
ISO	.203	.154
BB%	10.1%	7.2%
K%	21.6%	22.2%
wOBA	.381	.311
wRC+	149	99
WAR	5.3	2.6

Postseason

Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.

Every published postseason, batting, summed with the rates recomputed from the counts.
Statistic	Randy Arozarena	Julio Rodríguez
G	45	17
PA	184	83
H	47	15
HR	12	4
RBI	19	11
BB	17	10
SO	52	26
SB	8	1
AVG	.292	.211
OBP	.380	.325
SLG	.565	.479
OPS	.946	.804

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the season table.
Statistic	Randy Arozarena	Julio Rodríguez
G	949	738
PA	4,029	3,251
H	890	801
2B	194	136
3B	12	9
HR	144	134
RBI	469	412
BB	395	216
SO	1,013	773
SB	157	138
AVG	.255	.269
SLG	.442	.455
WAR	21.4	21.4

Randy Arozarena’s full profile →Julio Rodríguez’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Randy Arozarena vs

Julio Rodríguez vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.