Head to head · 2026 batting

Pete Crow-Armstrong vs Julio Rodríguez

In 2026 Pete Crow-Armstrong has been worth 6.1 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Two of the 6 most valuable center fielders of 2025 by dbWAR.
Their 2025 seasons were among each other's nearest on rate statistics.

Pete Crow-Armstrong CHC

Julio Rodríguez SEA

2026 season

2026 batting. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	Pete Crow-Armstrong	Julio Rodríguez
G	162	150
PA	726	654
H	175	147
HR	45	22
RBI	107	71
SB	41	22
AVG	.280	.247
OBP	.372	.307
SLG	.570	.401
OPS	.943	.708
ISO	.291	.154
BB%	11.4%	7.2%
K%	25.8%	22.2%
wOBA	.402	.311
wRC+	157	99
WAR	8.7	2.6

Postseason

Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.

Every published postseason, batting, summed with the rates recomputed from the counts.
Statistic	Pete Crow-Armstrong	Julio Rodríguez
G	10	17
PA	37	83
H	5	15
HR	0	4
RBI	3	11
BB	2	10
SO	16	26
SB	2	1
AVG	.147	.211
OBP	.194	.325
SLG	.147	.479
OPS	.342	.804

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the season table.
Statistic	Pete Crow-Armstrong	Julio Rodríguez
G	448	738
PA	1,802	3,251
H	409	801
2B	81	136
3B	18	9
HR	86	134
RBI	250	412
BB	136	216
SO	447	773
SB	105	138
AVG	.255	.269
SLG	.489	.455
WAR	13.6	21.4

Pete Crow-Armstrong’s full profile →Julio Rodríguez’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Pete Crow-Armstrong vs

Julio Rodríguez vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.