Head to head · 2026 batting

Pete Crow-Armstrong vs Julio Rodríguez

So far in 2026 Pete Crow-Armstrong has been worth 5.9 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Pete Crow-Armstrong CHC

Julio Rodríguez SEA

2026 batting, season in progress. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	Pete Crow-Armstrong	Julio Rodríguez
G	155	144
PA	697	627
H	167	139
HR	44	21
RBI	105	66
SB	37	22
AVG	.277	.243
OBP	.369	.303
SLG	.571	.397
OPS	.941	.700
ISO	.294	.154
BB%	11.2%	7.3%
K%	26.1%	22.5%
wOBA	.401	.308
wRC+	156	96
WAR	8.2	2.3

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2015 begins at 2015, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the table above.
Statistic	Pete Crow-Armstrong	Julio Rodríguez
G	441	732
PA	1,773	3,224
H	401	793
2B	79	135
3B	18	9
HR	85	133
RBI	248	407
BB	131	215
SO	442	769
SB	101	138
AVG	.254	.268
SLG	.488	.455
WAR	13.1	21.1

Pete Crow-Armstrong’s full profile →Julio Rodríguez’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Pete Crow-Armstrong vs

Julio Rodríguez vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.