Head to head · 2026 batting

Brandon Marsh vs Heliot Ramos

In 2026 the two have been worth the same 0.9 wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Brandon Marsh PHI

Heliot Ramos SF

2026 batting. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	Brandon Marsh	Heliot Ramos
G	153	112
PA	568	442
H	136	99
HR	18	13
RBI	62	46
SB	11	4
AVG	.260	.245
OBP	.304	.305
SLG	.408	.411
OPS	.713	.716
ISO	.149	.166
BB%	6.0%	7.0%
K%	25.0%	27.4%
wOBA	.309	.314
wRC+	89	99
WAR	0.9	0.9

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2015 begins at 2015, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the table above.
Statistic	Brandon Marsh	Heliot Ramos
G	746	422
PA	2,662	1,737
H	622	398
2B	117	71
3B	20	8
HR	70	57
RBI	296	189
BB	229	126
SO	799	440
SB	63	16
AVG	.261	.253
SLG	.415	.417
WAR	10.6	4.8

Brandon Marsh’s full profile →Heliot Ramos’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Brandon Marsh vs

Heliot Ramos vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.