Head to head · 2026 pitching

Matthew Liberatore vs Aaron Nola

In 2026 Matthew Liberatore has been worth 0.1 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Matthew Liberatore STL

Aaron Nola PHI

2026 pitching. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for ERA, FIP, WHIP and walks that is the lower one.
Statistic	Matthew Liberatore	Aaron Nola
G	31	33
GS	31	33
IP	155.0	175.1
W	6	7
SO	154	177
ERA	5.23	4.67
FIP	4.63	4.87
WHIP	1.46	1.35
K/9	8.9	9.1
BB/9	3.2	3.0
FIP−	111	117
WAR	1.0	0.9

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2015 begins at 2015, not at his real first game.

Career pitching totals. ERA, WHIP and the per-nine rates are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; FIP needs each season’s own constant and is left to the table above.
Statistic	Matthew Liberatore	Aaron Nola
G	151	318
GS	84	318
IP	489.0	1,891.0
W	22	116
L	38	101
SV	0	0
SO	426	2,053
BB	166	508
ERA	4.82	3.91
WHIP	1.40	1.17
K/9	7.8	9.8
BB/9	3.1	2.4
HR/9	1.3	1.2
WAR	4.0	36.1

Matthew Liberatore’s full profile →Aaron Nola’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Matthew Liberatore vs

Aaron Nola vs

How these are computed

FIP uses the constant solved from this season’s own runs, and FIP− is park-adjusted against the same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.