Head to head · 2026 pitching

Matthew Liberatore vs Michael McGreevy

In 2026 Michael McGreevy has been worth 0.8 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Their 2025 seasons were among each other's nearest on rate statistics.

Matthew Liberatore STL

Michael McGreevy STL

2026 season

2026 pitching. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for ERA, FIP, WHIP and walks that is the lower one.
Statistic	Matthew Liberatore	Michael McGreevy
G	31	31
GS	31	31
IP	155.0	168.2
W	6	7
SO	154	115
ERA	5.23	3.95
FIP	4.63	4.23
WHIP	1.46	1.28
K/9	8.9	6.1
BB/9	3.2	2.6
FIP−	111	101
WAR	1.0	1.8

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.

Career pitching totals. ERA, WHIP and the per-nine rates are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; FIP needs each season’s own constant and is left to the season table.
Statistic	Matthew Liberatore	Michael McGreevy
G	151	52
GS	84	50
IP	489.0	287.1
W	22	18
L	38	13
SV	0	0
SO	426	191
BB	166	70
ERA	4.82	3.95
WHIP	1.40	1.23
K/9	7.8	6.0
BB/9	3.1	2.2
HR/9	1.3	1.1
WAR	4.0	3.4

Matthew Liberatore’s full profile →Michael McGreevy’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Matthew Liberatore vs

Michael McGreevy vs

How these are computed

FIP uses the constant solved from this season’s own runs, and FIP− is park-adjusted against the same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.