Head to head · 2025 pitching

Sam Long vs Taylor Rogers

In 2025 Taylor Rogers has been worth 0.6 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Sam Long KC

Taylor Rogers CIN

2025 pitching. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for ERA, FIP, WHIP and walks that is the lower one.
Statistic	Sam Long	Taylor Rogers
G	39	57
GS	0	0
IP	40.1	50.2
W	2	3
SO	33	53
ERA	5.36	3.38
FIP	5.54	4.38
WHIP	1.74	1.38
K/9	7.4	9.4
BB/9	4.9	4.1
FIP−	133	105
WAR	-0.4	0.2

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2015 begins at 2015, not at his real first game.

Career pitching totals. ERA, WHIP and the per-nine rates are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; FIP needs each season’s own constant and is left to the table above.
Statistic	Sam Long	Taylor Rogers
G	162	628
GS	12	0
IP	211.0	598.1
W	8	37
L	11	40
SV	4	85
SO	180	678
BB	89	196
ERA	4.65	3.46
WHIP	1.40	1.24
K/9	7.7	10.2
BB/9	3.8	2.9
HR/9	1.3	0.9
WAR	0.1	8.9

Sam Long’s full profile →Taylor Rogers’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Sam Long vs

Taylor Rogers vs

How these are computed

FIP uses the constant solved from this season’s own runs, and FIP− is park-adjusted against the same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.