Head to head · 2025 pitching

George Kirby vs Pablo López

In 2025 George Kirby has been worth 0.7 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

George Kirby SEA

Pablo López MIN

2025 pitching. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for ERA, FIP, WHIP and walks that is the lower one.
Statistic	George Kirby	Pablo López
G	23	14
GS	23	14
IP	126.0	75.2
W	10	5
SO	137	73
ERA	4.21	2.74
FIP	3.37	3.19
WHIP	1.19	1.11
K/9	9.8	8.7
BB/9	2.1	2.4
FIP−	81	77
WAR	2.5	1.8

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2015 begins at 2015, not at his real first game.

Career pitching totals. ERA, WHIP and the per-nine rates are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; FIP needs each season’s own constant and is left to the table above.
Statistic	George Kirby	Pablo López
G	141	172
GS	141	172
IP	807.1	965.0
W	54	59
L	45	53
SV	0	0
SO	764	994
BB	137	251
ERA	3.72	3.81
WHIP	1.17	1.18
K/9	8.5	9.3
BB/9	1.5	2.3
HR/9	1.0	1.1
WAR	16.3	18.5

George Kirby’s full profile →Pablo López’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

George Kirby vs

Pablo López vs

How these are computed

FIP uses the constant solved from this season’s own runs, and FIP− is park-adjusted against the same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.