DataBaseball
2026

Head to head · 2025 pitching

Pablo López vs Ranger Suarez

In 2025 Ranger Suarez has been worth 2.0 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

2025 season

2025 pitching. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for ERA, FIP, WHIP and walks that is the lower one.
StatisticPablo LópezRanger Suarez
G1426
GS1426
IP75.2157.1
W512
SO73151
ERA2.743.20
FIP3.193.21
WHIP1.111.22
K/98.78.6
BB/92.42.2
FIP−7777
WAR1.83.8

Postseason

Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.

Every published postseason, pitching, summed with the rates recomputed from the counts.
StatisticPablo LópezRanger Suarez
G311
GS38
IP17.242.2
W24
SV01
SO1744
BB313
ERA1.531.48
WHIP0.961.05
K/98.79.3
BB/91.52.7

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.

Career pitching totals. ERA, WHIP and the per-nine rates are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; FIP needs each season’s own constant and is left to the season table.
StatisticPablo LópezRanger Suarez
G172215
GS172147
IP965.0910.1
W5961
L5342
SV04
SO994845
BB251286
ERA3.813.35
WHIP1.181.26
K/99.38.4
BB/92.32.8
HR/91.10.8
WAR18.517.9

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

How these are computed

FIP uses the constant solved from this season’s own runs, and FIP− is park-adjusted against the same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.