DataBaseball
2026

Head to head · 2025 pitching

Pablo López vs Logan Webb

In 2025 Logan Webb has been worth 4.4 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

2025 season

2025 pitching. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for ERA, FIP, WHIP and walks that is the lower one.
StatisticPablo LópezLogan Webb
G1434
GS1434
IP75.2207.0
W515
SO73224
ERA2.743.22
FIP3.192.60
WHIP1.111.24
K/98.79.7
BB/92.42.0
FIP−7763
WAR1.86.2

Postseason

Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.

Every published postseason, pitching, summed with the rates recomputed from the counts.
StatisticPablo LópezLogan Webb
G32
GS32
IP17.214.2
W21
SV00
SO1717
BB31
ERA1.530.61
WHIP0.960.68
K/98.710.4
BB/91.50.6

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.

Career pitching totals. ERA, WHIP and the per-nine rates are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; FIP needs each season’s own constant and is left to the season table.
StatisticPablo LópezLogan Webb
G172207
GS172204
IP965.01,223.0
W5978
L5362
SV00
SO9941,128
BB251291
ERA3.813.50
WHIP1.181.19
K/99.38.3
BB/92.32.1
HR/91.10.6
WAR18.530.1

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

How these are computed

FIP uses the constant solved from this season’s own runs, and FIP− is park-adjusted against the same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.