Head to head · 2026 pitching

Cade Smith vs Gabe Speier

In 2026 Cade Smith has been worth 1.8 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Their 2025 seasons were among each other's nearest on rate statistics.

Cade Smith CLE

Gabe Speier SEA

2026 season

2026 pitching. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for ERA, FIP, WHIP and walks that is the lower one.
Statistic	Cade Smith	Gabe Speier
G	69	54
GS	0	0
IP	74.0	46.0
W	6	2
SO	107	45
ERA	1.95	2.93
FIP	2.18	3.86
WHIP	0.96	1.09
K/9	13.0	8.8
BB/9	2.8	2.9
FIP−	52	92
WAR	2.2	0.4

Postseason

Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.

Every published postseason, pitching, summed with the rates recomputed from the counts.
Statistic	Cade Smith	Gabe Speier
G	21	7
GS	0	0
IP	24.2	7.1
W	2	1
SV	2	0
SO	34	6
BB	6	2
ERA	2.55	6.14
WHIP	0.61	1.09
K/9	12.4	7.4
BB/9	2.2	2.5

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.

Career pitching totals. ERA, WHIP and the per-nine rates are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; FIP needs each season’s own constant and is left to the season table.
Statistic	Cade Smith	Gabe Speier
G	219	269
GS	0	1
IP	223.0	226.1
W	20	8
L	7	12
SV	58	2
SO	314	259
BB	59	66
ERA	2.26	3.50
WHIP	0.96	1.10
K/9	12.7	10.3
BB/9	2.4	2.6
HR/9	0.4	1.0
WAR	7.4	3.5

Cade Smith’s full profile →Gabe Speier’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Cade Smith vs

Gabe Speier vs

How these are computed

FIP uses the constant solved from this season’s own runs, and FIP− is park-adjusted against the same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.