Head to head · 2026 pitching
Tanner Bibee vs Cade Smith
In 2026 Cade Smith has been worth 0.6 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.
2026 season
| Statistic | Tanner Bibee | Cade Smith |
|---|---|---|
| G | 33 | 69 |
| GS | 33 | 0 |
| IP | 188.0 | 74.0 |
| W | 7 | 6 |
| SO | 148 | 107 |
| ERA | 4.36 | 1.95 |
| FIP | 4.52 | 2.18 |
| WHIP | 1.22 | 0.96 |
| K/9 | 7.1 | 13.0 |
| BB/9 | 2.6 | 2.8 |
| FIP− | 108 | 52 |
| WAR | 1.6 | 2.2 |
Postseason
Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.
| Statistic | Tanner Bibee | Cade Smith |
|---|---|---|
| G | 6 | 21 |
| GS | 5 | 0 |
| IP | 20.2 | 24.2 |
| W | 0 | 2 |
| SV | 0 | 2 |
| SO | 23 | 34 |
| BB | 9 | 6 |
| ERA | 3.92 | 2.55 |
| WHIP | 1.60 | 0.61 |
| K/9 | 10.0 | 12.4 |
| BB/9 | 3.9 | 2.2 |
Career
Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.
| Statistic | Tanner Bibee | Cade Smith |
|---|---|---|
| G | 120 | 219 |
| GS | 120 | 0 |
| IP | 686.0 | 223.0 |
| W | 41 | 20 |
| L | 38 | 7 |
| SV | 0 | 58 |
| SO | 638 | 314 |
| BB | 198 | 59 |
| ERA | 3.82 | 2.26 |
| WHIP | 1.19 | 0.96 |
| K/9 | 8.4 | 12.7 |
| BB/9 | 2.6 | 2.4 |
| HR/9 | 1.2 | 0.4 |
| WAR | 9.7 | 7.4 |
More head to heads
The same seasons, measured against somebody else.
FIP uses the constant solved from this season’s own runs, and FIP− is park-adjusted against the same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.