Head to head · 2026 pitching
Tanner Bibee vs Matthew Boyd
In 2026 Tanner Bibee has been worth 0.1 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.
- Their 2026 seasons were among each other's nearest on rate statistics.
2026 season
| Statistic | Tanner Bibee | Matthew Boyd |
|---|---|---|
| G | 33 | 22 |
| GS | 33 | 22 |
| IP | 188.0 | 126.2 |
| W | 7 | 10 |
| SO | 148 | 96 |
| ERA | 4.36 | 3.91 |
| FIP | 4.52 | 4.22 |
| WHIP | 1.22 | 1.21 |
| K/9 | 7.1 | 6.8 |
| BB/9 | 2.6 | 2.8 |
| FIP− | 108 | 101 |
| WAR | 1.6 | 1.5 |
Postseason
Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.
| Statistic | Tanner Bibee | Matthew Boyd |
|---|---|---|
| G | 6 | 8 |
| GS | 5 | 7 |
| IP | 20.2 | 25.2 |
| W | 0 | 0 |
| SV | 0 | 0 |
| SO | 23 | 27 |
| BB | 9 | 13 |
| ERA | 3.92 | 2.81 |
| WHIP | 1.60 | 1.40 |
| K/9 | 10.0 | 9.5 |
| BB/9 | 3.9 | 4.6 |
Career
Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.
| Statistic | Tanner Bibee | Matthew Boyd |
|---|---|---|
| G | 120 | 235 |
| GS | 120 | 221 |
| IP | 686.0 | 1,214.2 |
| W | 41 | 70 |
| L | 38 | 82 |
| SV | 0 | 0 |
| SO | 638 | 1,141 |
| BB | 198 | 375 |
| ERA | 3.82 | 4.50 |
| WHIP | 1.19 | 1.27 |
| K/9 | 8.4 | 8.5 |
| BB/9 | 2.6 | 2.8 |
| HR/9 | 1.2 | 1.4 |
| WAR | 9.7 | 12.6 |
More head to heads
The same seasons, measured against somebody else.
FIP uses the constant solved from this season’s own runs, and FIP− is park-adjusted against the same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.