Head to head · 2026 pitching

Michael Grove vs Emilio Pagán

So far in 2026 Emilio Pagán has been worth 0.4 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Michael Grove TB

Emilio Pagán CIN

2026 pitching, season in progress. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for ERA, FIP, WHIP and walks that is the lower one.
Statistic	Michael Grove	Emilio Pagán
G	3	43
GS	0	0
IP	7.0	40.2
W	1	5
SO	6	43
ERA	5.14	3.54
FIP	6.96	4.33
WHIP	1.00	1.03
K/9	7.7	9.5
BB/9	0.0	2.4
FIP−	166	103
WAR	-0.2	0.2

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2015 begins at 2015, not at his real first game.

Career pitching totals. ERA, WHIP and the per-nine rates are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; FIP needs each season’s own constant and is left to the table above.
Statistic	Michael Grove	Emilio Pagán
G	67	520
GS	20	2
IP	156.1	547.1
W	8	33
L	7	28
SV	0	89
SO	157	624
BB	45	158
ERA	5.47	3.65
WHIP	1.36	1.07
K/9	9.0	10.3
BB/9	2.6	2.6
HR/9	1.6	1.5
WAR	0.8	4.4

Michael Grove’s full profile →Emilio Pagán’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Michael Grove vs

Emilio Pagán vs

How these are computed

FIP uses the constant solved from this season’s own runs, and FIP− is park-adjusted against the same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.