Head to head · 2026 batting

Ernie Clement vs Ildemaro Vargas

In 2026 Ernie Clement has been worth 0.1 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Their 2026 seasons were among each other's nearest on rate statistics.
Their 2025 seasons were among each other's nearest on rate statistics.

Ernie Clement TOR

Ildemaro Vargas AZ

2026 season

2026 batting. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	Ernie Clement	Ildemaro Vargas
G	158	135
PA	621	486
H	153	115
HR	9	9
RBI	48	67
SB	7	3
AVG	.259	.254
OBP	.285	.298
SLG	.364	.377
OPS	.649	.675
ISO	.105	.124
BB%	3.5%	5.6%
K%	9.3%	10.1%
wOBA	.285	.297
wRC+	77	86
WAR	0.7	0.6

Postseason

Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.

Every published postseason, batting, summed with the rates recomputed from the counts.
Statistic	Ernie Clement	Ildemaro Vargas
G	18	—
PA	77	—
H	30	—
HR	1	—
RBI	9	—
BB	1	—
SO	5	—
SB	1	—
AVG	.411	—
OBP	.416	—
SLG	.562	—
OPS	.977	—

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the season table.
Statistic	Ernie Clement	Ildemaro Vargas
G	561	569
PA	2,025	1,799
H	495	418
2B	98	77
3B	7	12
HR	34	29
RBI	174	212
BB	79	93
SO	209	196
SB	26	19
AVG	.260	.250
SLG	.373	.362
WAR	3.4	1.5

Ernie Clement’s full profile →Ildemaro Vargas’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Ernie Clement vs

Ildemaro Vargas vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.