DataBaseball
2026

Head to head · 2026 pitching

Brant Hurter vs Ryan Yarbrough

In 2026 Ryan Yarbrough has been worth 0.5 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

2026 season

2026 pitching. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for ERA, FIP, WHIP and walks that is the lower one.
StatisticBrant HurterRyan Yarbrough
G2938
GS02
IP35.163.1
W42
SO2449
ERA3.063.69
FIP3.473.45
WHIP1.101.22
K/96.17.0
BB/93.83.3
FIP−8383
WAR0.51.0

Postseason

Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.

Every published postseason, pitching, summed with the rates recomputed from the counts.
StatisticBrant HurterRyan Yarbrough
G68
GS02
IP8.217.2
W12
SV00
SO28
BB25
ERA2.083.06
WHIP1.271.30
K/92.14.1
BB/92.12.5

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.

Career pitching totals. ERA, WHIP and the per-nine rates are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; FIP needs each season’s own constant and is left to the season table.
StatisticBrant HurterRyan Yarbrough
G82253
GS578
IP143.2895.1
W1458
L542
SV27
SO130703
BB48219
ERA2.634.18
WHIP1.131.19
K/98.17.1
BB/93.02.2
HR/90.61.2
WAR2.27.1

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

How these are computed

FIP uses the constant solved from this season’s own runs, and FIP− is park-adjusted against the same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.