DataBaseball
2026

Head to head · 2026 pitching

Brant Hurter vs Orion Kerkering

In 2026 Brant Hurter has been worth 0.1 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

2026 season

2026 pitching. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for ERA, FIP, WHIP and walks that is the lower one.
StatisticBrant HurterOrion Kerkering
G2963
GS00
IP35.158.0
W47
SO2463
ERA3.064.97
FIP3.474.17
WHIP1.101.45
K/96.19.8
BB/93.85.3
FIP−83100
WAR0.50.4

Postseason

Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.

Every published postseason, pitching, summed with the rates recomputed from the counts.
StatisticBrant HurterOrion Kerkering
G615
GS00
IP8.211.2
W10
SV00
SO213
BB27
ERA2.083.86
WHIP1.271.63
K/92.110.0
BB/92.15.4

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.

Career pitching totals. ERA, WHIP and the per-nine rates are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; FIP needs each season’s own constant and is left to the season table.
StatisticBrant HurterOrion Kerkering
G82199
GS52
IP143.2184.0
W1421
L58
SV26
SO130208
BB4880
ERA2.633.47
WHIP1.131.30
K/98.110.2
BB/93.03.9
HR/90.60.6
WAR2.22.8

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

How these are computed

FIP uses the constant solved from this season’s own runs, and FIP− is park-adjusted against the same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.