Head to head · 2026 pitching
Brant Hurter vs Jacob Latz
In 2026 Jacob Latz has been worth 1.0 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.
- Their 2025 seasons were among each other's nearest on rate statistics.
2026 season
| Statistic | Brant Hurter | Jacob Latz |
|---|---|---|
| G | 29 | 58 |
| GS | 0 | 1 |
| IP | 35.1 | 72.0 |
| W | 4 | 3 |
| SO | 24 | 83 |
| ERA | 3.06 | 2.13 |
| FIP | 3.47 | 2.84 |
| WHIP | 1.10 | 0.81 |
| K/9 | 6.1 | 10.4 |
| BB/9 | 3.8 | 2.9 |
| FIP− | 83 | 68 |
| WAR | 0.5 | 1.5 |
Postseason
Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.
| Statistic | Brant Hurter | Jacob Latz |
|---|---|---|
| G | 6 | — |
| GS | 0 | — |
| IP | 8.2 | — |
| W | 1 | — |
| SV | 0 | — |
| SO | 2 | — |
| BB | 2 | — |
| ERA | 2.08 | — |
| WHIP | 1.27 | — |
| K/9 | 2.1 | — |
| BB/9 | 2.1 | — |
Career
Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.
| Statistic | Brant Hurter | Jacob Latz |
|---|---|---|
| G | 82 | 141 |
| GS | 5 | 10 |
| IP | 143.2 | 212.1 |
| W | 14 | 7 |
| L | 5 | 8 |
| SV | 2 | 31 |
| SO | 130 | 208 |
| BB | 48 | 90 |
| ERA | 2.63 | 2.76 |
| WHIP | 1.13 | 1.13 |
| K/9 | 8.1 | 8.8 |
| BB/9 | 3.0 | 3.8 |
| HR/9 | 0.6 | 0.9 |
| WAR | 2.2 | 2.1 |
More head to heads
The same seasons, measured against somebody else.
FIP uses the constant solved from this season’s own runs, and FIP− is park-adjusted against the same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.