Head to head · 2026 pitching

Aaron Ashby vs Jeff Hoffman

In 2026 the two have been worth the same 1.7 wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Aaron Ashby MIL

Jeff Hoffman TOR

2026 pitching. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for ERA, FIP, WHIP and walks that is the lower one.
Statistic	Aaron Ashby	Jeff Hoffman
G	75	71
GS	1	0
IP	89.1	66.0
W	13	6
SO	116	102
ERA	3.12	3.55
FIP	3.11	2.48
WHIP	1.31	1.32
K/9	11.7	13.9
BB/9	4.1	4.1
FIP−	74	59
WAR	1.7	1.7

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2015 begins at 2015, not at his real first game.

Career pitching totals. ERA, WHIP and the per-nine rates are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; FIP needs each season’s own constant and is left to the table above.
Statistic	Aaron Ashby	Jeff Hoffman
G	172	398
GS	27	50
IP	323.1	601.0
W	24	38
L	19	41
SV	9	51
SO	390	665
BB	134	267
ERA	3.48	4.63
WHIP	1.28	1.38
K/9	10.9	10.0
BB/9	3.7	4.0
HR/9	0.9	1.4
WAR	5.2	4.5

Aaron Ashby’s full profile →Jeff Hoffman’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Aaron Ashby vs

Jeff Hoffman vs

How these are computed

FIP uses the constant solved from this season’s own runs, and FIP− is park-adjusted against the same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.