Head to head · 2025 pitching

Slade Cecconi vs Carson Spiers

In 2025 Slade Cecconi has been worth 1.1 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Slade Cecconi CLE

Carson Spiers CIN

2025 pitching. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for ERA, FIP, WHIP and walks that is the lower one.
Statistic	Slade Cecconi	Carson Spiers
G	23	3
GS	23	2
IP	132.0	13.1
W	7	0
SO	109	11
ERA	4.30	6.07
FIP	4.64	6.21
WHIP	1.19	1.50
K/9	7.4	7.4
BB/9	2.2	4.7
FIP−	112	149
WAR	0.9	-0.2

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2015 begins at 2015, not at his real first game.

Career pitching totals. ERA, WHIP and the per-nine rates are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; FIP needs each season’s own constant and is left to the table above.
Statistic	Slade Cecconi	Carson Spiers
G	77	29
GS	61	14
IP	356.0	117.0
W	14	5
L	22	10
SV	0	1
SO	292	103
BB	92	41
ERA	5.03	5.69
WHIP	1.32	1.57
K/9	7.4	7.9
BB/9	2.3	3.2
HR/9	1.6	1.8
WAR	1.9	-0.5

Slade Cecconi’s full profile →Carson Spiers’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Slade Cecconi vs

Carson Spiers vs

How these are computed

FIP uses the constant solved from this season’s own runs, and FIP− is park-adjusted against the same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.