Head to head · 2026 pitching

Slade Cecconi vs Jeffrey Springs

So far in 2026 Slade Cecconi has been worth 1.5 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Slade Cecconi CLE

Jeffrey Springs ATH

2026 pitching, season in progress. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for ERA, FIP, WHIP and walks that is the lower one.
Statistic	Slade Cecconi	Jeffrey Springs
G	27	28
GS	21	28
IP	120.0	138.1
W	5	4
SO	99	109
ERA	4.95	6.18
FIP	4.56	5.93
WHIP	1.44	1.47
K/9	7.4	7.1
BB/9	2.9	3.6
FIP−	109	142
WAR	0.8	-0.7

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2015 begins at 2015, not at his real first game.

Career pitching totals. ERA, WHIP and the per-nine rates are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; FIP needs each season’s own constant and is left to the table above.
Statistic	Slade Cecconi	Jeffrey Springs
G	77	205
GS	61	95
IP	356.0	623.0
W	14	38
L	22	37
SV	0	2
SO	292	606
BB	92	214
ERA	5.03	4.20
WHIP	1.32	1.29
K/9	7.4	8.8
BB/9	2.3	3.1
HR/9	1.6	1.5
WAR	1.9	5.2

Slade Cecconi’s full profile →Jeffrey Springs’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Slade Cecconi vs

Jeffrey Springs vs

How these are computed

FIP uses the constant solved from this season’s own runs, and FIP− is park-adjusted against the same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.