Head to head · 2026 pitching

Sean Burke vs Jacob deGrom

In 2026 Jacob deGrom has been worth 0.9 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Sean Burke CWS

Jacob deGrom TEX

2026 pitching. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for ERA, FIP, WHIP and walks that is the lower one.
Statistic	Sean Burke	Jacob deGrom
G	32	31
GS	27	31
IP	172.1	162.2
W	11	11
SO	185	201
ERA	3.34	4.20
FIP	3.63	3.12
WHIP	1.20	1.14
K/9	9.7	11.1
BB/9	3.2	2.5
FIP−	87	75
WAR	3.0	3.9

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2015 begins at 2015, not at his real first game.

Career pitching totals. ERA, WHIP and the per-nine rates are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; FIP needs each season’s own constant and is left to the table above.
Statistic	Sean Burke	Jacob deGrom
G	64	257
GS	52	257
IP	325.2	1,562.0
W	17	98
L	18	70
SV	0	0
SO	340	1,908
BB	132	348
ERA	3.59	2.73
WHIP	1.29	0.99
K/9	9.4	11.0
BB/9	3.6	2.0
HR/9	1.2	0.9
WAR	3.6	43.8

Sean Burke’s full profile →Jacob deGrom’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Sean Burke vs

Jacob deGrom vs

How these are computed

FIP uses the constant solved from this season’s own runs, and FIP− is park-adjusted against the same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.