Head to head · 2026 batting

David Fry vs Tyler O'Neill

In 2026 the two have been worth the same 0.2 wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

David Fry CLE

Tyler O'Neill BAL

2026 batting. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	David Fry	Tyler O'Neill
G	90	83
PA	214	260
H	37	49
HR	8	10
RBI	20	23
SB	0	1
AVG	.201	.212
OBP	.313	.300
SLG	.364	.377
OPS	.677	.677
ISO	.163	.165
BB%	13.1%	10.4%
K%	27.6%	27.7%
wOBA	.307	.304
wRC+	91	93
WAR	0.2	0.2

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2015 begins at 2015, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the table above.
Statistic	David Fry	Tyler O'Neill
G	322	712
PA	876	2,578
H	174	547
2B	34	99
3B	1	4
HR	34	128
RBI	109	327
BB	87	238
SO	231	773
SB	7	49
AVG	.227	.239
SLG	.407	.454
WAR	1.8	9.8

David Fry’s full profile →Tyler O'Neill’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

David Fry vs

Tyler O'Neill vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.