Head to head · 2026 batting

CJ Abrams vs Zack Gelof

In 2026 CJ Abrams has been worth 2.8 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

CJ Abrams WSH

Zack Gelof ATH

2026 batting. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	CJ Abrams	Zack Gelof
G	152	110
PA	654	435
H	151	101
HR	33	22
RBI	106	55
SB	34	16
AVG	.261	.256
OBP	.336	.322
SLG	.497	.475
OPS	.834	.796
ISO	.237	.218
BB%	8.7%	7.1%
K%	24.2%	24.6%
wOBA	.359	.347
wRC+	123	107
WAR	5.3	2.5

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2015 begins at 2015, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the table above.
Statistic	CJ Abrams	Zack Gelof
G	673	343
PA	2,807	1,383
H	641	294
2B	134	59
3B	23	5
HR	92	55
RBI	316	143
BB	171	102
SO	579	423
SB	150	56
AVG	.252	.235
SLG	.431	.421
WAR	17.0	5.3

CJ Abrams’s full profile →Zack Gelof’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

CJ Abrams vs

Zack Gelof vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.