Head to head · 2026 batting

CJ Abrams vs Pete Crow-Armstrong

In 2026 Pete Crow-Armstrong has been worth 3.4 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

CJ Abrams WSH

Pete Crow-Armstrong CHC

2026 batting. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	CJ Abrams	Pete Crow-Armstrong
G	152	162
PA	654	726
H	151	175
HR	33	45
RBI	106	107
SB	34	41
AVG	.261	.280
OBP	.336	.372
SLG	.497	.570
OPS	.834	.943
ISO	.237	.291
BB%	8.7%	11.4%
K%	24.2%	25.8%
wOBA	.359	.402
wRC+	123	157
WAR	5.3	8.7

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2015 begins at 2015, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the table above.
Statistic	CJ Abrams	Pete Crow-Armstrong
G	673	448
PA	2,807	1,802
H	641	409
2B	134	81
3B	23	18
HR	92	86
RBI	316	250
BB	171	136
SO	579	447
SB	150	105
AVG	.252	.255
SLG	.431	.489
WAR	17.0	13.6

CJ Abrams’s full profile →Pete Crow-Armstrong’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

CJ Abrams vs

Pete Crow-Armstrong vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.