Head to head · 2026 ALCS batting
Travis Bazzana vs Yandy Díaz
In 2026 Travis Bazzana has been worth 0.2 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.
Postseason
Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.
| Statistic | Travis Bazzana | Yandy Díaz |
|---|---|---|
| G | 6 | 6 |
| PA | 23 | 28 |
| H | 4 | 9 |
| HR | 1 | 2 |
| RBI | 1 | 4 |
| BB | 2 | 0 |
| SO | 4 | 6 |
| SB | 1 | 0 |
| AVG | .190 | .333 |
| OBP | .261 | .357 |
| SLG | .333 | .704 |
| OPS | .594 | 1.061 |
| Statistic | Travis Bazzana | Yandy Díaz |
|---|---|---|
| G | 11 | 40 |
| PA | 42 | 160 |
| H | 6 | 30 |
| HR | 1 | 4 |
| RBI | 2 | 10 |
| BB | 5 | 15 |
| SO | 8 | 36 |
| SB | 1 | 0 |
| AVG | .162 | .208 |
| OBP | .262 | .287 |
| SLG | .297 | .347 |
| OPS | .559 | .635 |
2026 season
| Statistic | Travis Bazzana | Yandy Díaz |
|---|---|---|
| G | 124 | 154 |
| PA | 517 | 686 |
| H | 110 | 180 |
| HR | 15 | 22 |
| RBI | 57 | 85 |
| SB | 19 | 3 |
| AVG | .245 | .293 |
| OBP | .335 | .359 |
| SLG | .408 | .446 |
| OPS | .742 | .805 |
| ISO | .163 | .153 |
| BB% | 10.8% | 8.2% |
| K% | 20.7% | 14.3% |
| wOBA | .330 | .352 |
| wRC+ | 107 | 123 |
| WAR | 2.7 | 2.5 |
Career
Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.
| Statistic | Travis Bazzana | Yandy Díaz |
|---|---|---|
| G | 124 | 1,052 |
| PA | 517 | 4,441 |
| H | 110 | 1,137 |
| 2B | 22 | 210 |
| 3B | 3 | 8 |
| HR | 15 | 122 |
| RBI | 57 | 509 |
| BB | 56 | 465 |
| SO | 107 | 656 |
| SB | 19 | 14 |
| AVG | .245 | .291 |
| SLG | .408 | .442 |
| WAR | 2.7 | 22.8 |
More head to heads
The same seasons, measured against somebody else.
wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.

