Head to head · 2026 ALCS batting
Travis Bazzana vs Junior Caminero
In 2026 Junior Caminero has been worth 3.0 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.
Postseason
Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.
| Statistic | Travis Bazzana | Junior Caminero |
|---|---|---|
| G | 6 | 6 |
| PA | 23 | 25 |
| H | 4 | 6 |
| HR | 1 | 1 |
| RBI | 1 | 4 |
| BB | 2 | 2 |
| SO | 4 | 11 |
| SB | 1 | 0 |
| AVG | .190 | .261 |
| OBP | .261 | .320 |
| SLG | .333 | .478 |
| OPS | .594 | .798 |
| Statistic | Travis Bazzana | Junior Caminero |
|---|---|---|
| G | 11 | 16 |
| PA | 42 | 59 |
| H | 6 | 13 |
| HR | 1 | 1 |
| RBI | 2 | 5 |
| BB | 5 | 5 |
| SO | 8 | 17 |
| SB | 1 | 0 |
| AVG | .162 | .241 |
| OBP | .262 | .305 |
| SLG | .297 | .370 |
| OPS | .559 | .675 |
2026 season
| Statistic | Travis Bazzana | Junior Caminero |
|---|---|---|
| G | 124 | 162 |
| PA | 517 | 702 |
| H | 110 | 170 |
| HR | 15 | 42 |
| RBI | 57 | 101 |
| SB | 19 | 3 |
| AVG | .245 | .276 |
| OBP | .335 | .360 |
| SLG | .408 | .524 |
| OPS | .742 | .885 |
| ISO | .163 | .248 |
| BB% | 10.8% | 11.3% |
| K% | 20.7% | 18.4% |
| wOBA | .330 | .377 |
| wRC+ | 107 | 140 |
| WAR | 2.7 | 5.7 |
Career
Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.
| Statistic | Travis Bazzana | Junior Caminero |
|---|---|---|
| G | 124 | 366 |
| PA | 517 | 1,568 |
| H | 110 | 378 |
| 2B | 22 | 63 |
| 3B | 3 | 2 |
| HR | 15 | 94 |
| RBI | 57 | 236 |
| BB | 56 | 133 |
| SO | 107 | 300 |
| SB | 19 | 12 |
| AVG | .245 | .267 |
| SLG | .408 | .513 |
| WAR | 2.7 | 10.5 |
More head to heads
The same seasons, measured against somebody else.
wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.

