Head to head · 2026 NLDS batting

Drake Baldwin vs Freddie Freeman

In 2026 Drake Baldwin has been worth 1.2 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Opponents in the 2026 NLDS, where the Los Angeles Dodgers won 3-1 over the Atlanta Braves.

Drake Baldwin ATL

Freddie Freeman LAD

Postseason

Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.

2026 NLDS.
Statistic	Drake Baldwin	Freddie Freeman
G	4	4
PA	17	17
H	1	4
HR	0	2
RBI	1	2
BB	3	2
SO	5	2
SB	0	0
AVG	.071	.267
OBP	.235	.353
SLG	.071	.667
OPS	.307	1.020

Every published postseason, batting, summed with the rates recomputed from the counts.
Statistic	Drake Baldwin	Freddie Freeman
G	7	87
PA	30	381
H	3	84
HR	0	18
RBI	2	42
BB	3	45
SO	8	71
SB	0	4
AVG	.111	.256
OBP	.200	.354
SLG	.148	.479
OPS	.348	.833

2026 season

2026 batting. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	Drake Baldwin	Freddie Freeman
G	138	153
PA	615	657
H	156	167
HR	25	16
RBI	79	70
SB	3	7
AVG	.284	.288
OBP	.358	.362
SLG	.459	.430
OPS	.817	.792
ISO	.175	.142
BB%	8.9%	10.0%
K%	21.5%	17.7%
wOBA	.359	.350
wRC+	126	123
WAR	4.0	2.8

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the season table.
Statistic	Drake Baldwin	Freddie Freeman
G	261	2,323
PA	1,061	10,020
H	267	2,598
2B	39	579
3B	2	34
HR	44	383
RBI	159	1,392
BB	93	1,136
SO	200	1,879
SB	3	111
AVG	.280	.299
SLG	.463	.505
WAR	7.5	70.6

Drake Baldwin’s full profile →Freddie Freeman’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Drake Baldwin vs

Freddie Freeman vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.