Head to head · 2025 pitching

Sawyer Gipson-Long vs Kyle Hart

In 2025 the two have been worth the same -0.2 wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Sawyer Gipson-Long DET

Kyle Hart SD

2025 pitching. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for ERA, FIP, WHIP and walks that is the lower one.
Statistic	Sawyer Gipson-Long	Kyle Hart
G	8	20
GS	3	6
IP	31.1	43.0
W	0	3
SO	26	37
ERA	7.18	5.86
FIP	5.56	5.18
WHIP	1.28	1.19
K/9	7.5	7.7
BB/9	1.7	2.7
FIP−	134	125
WAR	-0.2	-0.2

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2015 begins at 2015, not at his real first game.

Career pitching totals. ERA, WHIP and the per-nine rates are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; FIP needs each season’s own constant and is left to the table above.
Statistic	Sawyer Gipson-Long	Kyle Hart
G	12	68
GS	7	13
IP	51.1	116.2
W	1	4
L	2	7
SV	0	0
SO	52	107
BB	14	45
ERA	5.44	6.09
WHIP	1.21	1.35
K/9	9.1	8.3
BB/9	2.5	3.5
HR/9	1.8	1.4
WAR	0.3	0.3

Sawyer Gipson-Long’s full profile →Kyle Hart’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Sawyer Gipson-Long vs

Kyle Hart vs

How these are computed

FIP uses the constant solved from this season’s own runs, and FIP− is park-adjusted against the same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.