DataBaseball
2026

Head to head · 2025 pitching

Sawyer Gipson-Long vs Kevin Kelly

In 2025 Sawyer Gipson-Long has been worth 0.2 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

2025 season

2025 pitching. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for ERA, FIP, WHIP and walks that is the lower one.
StatisticSawyer Gipson-LongKevin Kelly
G841
GS30
IP31.139.2
W02
SO2635
ERA7.185.90
FIP5.565.66
WHIP1.281.36
K/97.57.9
BB/91.72.0
FIP−134136
WAR-0.2-0.4

Postseason

Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.

Every published postseason, pitching, summed with the rates recomputed from the counts.
StatisticSawyer Gipson-LongKevin Kelly
G—9
GS—0
IP—5.2
W—0
SV—0
SO—4
BB—3
ERA—3.18
WHIP—2.47
K/9—6.4
BB/9—4.8

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.

Career pitching totals. ERA, WHIP and the per-nine rates are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; FIP needs each season’s own constant and is left to the season table.
StatisticSawyer Gipson-LongKevin Kelly
G12237
GS70
IP51.1251.0
W118
L213
SV06
SO52217
BB1444
ERA5.443.23
WHIP1.211.02
K/99.17.8
BB/92.51.6
HR/91.80.9
WAR0.33.4

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

How these are computed

FIP uses the constant solved from this season’s own runs, and FIP− is park-adjusted against the same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.