Head to head · 2026 NLDS batting
Jackson Chourio vs Jackson Merrill
In 2026 Jackson Chourio has been worth 0.3 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.
Postseason
Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.
| Statistic | Jackson Chourio | Jackson Merrill |
|---|---|---|
| G | 4 | 4 |
| PA | 19 | 17 |
| H | 3 | 3 |
| HR | 1 | 0 |
| RBI | 6 | 0 |
| BB | 1 | 0 |
| SO | 1 | 6 |
| SB | 0 | 1 |
| AVG | .188 | .176 |
| OBP | .263 | .176 |
| SLG | .375 | .176 |
| OPS | .638 | .353 |
| Statistic | Jackson Chourio | Jackson Merrill |
|---|---|---|
| G | 25 | 16 |
| PA | 109 | 64 |
| H | 32 | 16 |
| HR | 6 | 2 |
| RBI | 20 | 9 |
| BB | 3 | 5 |
| SO | 23 | 16 |
| SB | 4 | 2 |
| AVG | .311 | .281 |
| OBP | .330 | .333 |
| SLG | .534 | .474 |
| OPS | .864 | .807 |
2026 season
| Statistic | Jackson Chourio | Jackson Merrill |
|---|---|---|
| G | 127 | 157 |
| PA | 573 | 664 |
| H | 152 | 156 |
| HR | 25 | 26 |
| RBI | 75 | 87 |
| SB | 23 | 27 |
| AVG | .291 | .254 |
| OBP | .351 | .303 |
| SLG | .487 | .440 |
| OPS | .837 | .743 |
| ISO | .195 | .186 |
| BB% | 8.2% | 6.2% |
| K% | 23.4% | 24.1% |
| wOBA | .362 | .322 |
| wRC+ | 130 | 106 |
| WAR | 3.9 | 3.6 |
Career
Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.
| Statistic | Jackson Chourio | Jackson Merrill |
|---|---|---|
| G | 403 | 425 |
| PA | 1,735 | 1,740 |
| H | 445 | 434 |
| 2B | 91 | 82 |
| 3B | 8 | 17 |
| HR | 67 | 66 |
| RBI | 232 | 244 |
| BB | 116 | 103 |
| SO | 376 | 369 |
| SB | 66 | 44 |
| AVG | .278 | .270 |
| SLG | .471 | .465 |
| WAR | 9.7 | 11.3 |
More head to heads
The same seasons, measured against somebody else.
wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.

