Head to head · 2026 batting

Joshua Báez vs Hunter Goodman

In 2026 Hunter Goodman has been worth 3.1 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Joshua Báez STL

Hunter Goodman COL

2026 batting. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	Joshua Báez	Hunter Goodman
G	29	138
PA	108	574
H	23	127
HR	7	41
RBI	18	88
SB	2	5
AVG	.230	.245
OBP	.278	.310
SLG	.510	.529
OPS	.788	.839
ISO	.280	.284
BB%	3.7%	8.0%
K%	30.6%	30.5%
wOBA	.335	.356
wRC+	116	120
WAR	0.5	3.6

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2015 begins at 2015, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the table above.
Statistic	Joshua Báez	Hunter Goodman
G	29	373
PA	108	1,454
H	23	331
2B	7	61
3B	0	10
HR	7	86
RBI	18	232
BB	4	92
SO	33	415
SB	2	8
AVG	.230	.247
SLG	.510	.500
WAR	0.5	6.8

Joshua Báez’s full profile →Hunter Goodman’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Joshua Báez vs

Hunter Goodman vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.