Head to head · 2026 batting

Jac Caglianone vs Cole Carrigg

In 2026 Jac Caglianone has been worth 0.8 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Jac Caglianone KC

Cole Carrigg COL

2026 batting. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	Jac Caglianone	Cole Carrigg
G	143	90
PA	553	372
H	148	93
HR	23	12
RBI	75	53
SB	7	11
AVG	.289	.279
OBP	.340	.341
SLG	.494	.477
OPS	.834	.818
ISO	.205	.198
BB%	6.0%	7.5%
K%	26.0%	23.9%
wOBA	.361	.354
wRC+	124	119
WAR	3.4	2.6

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2015 begins at 2015, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the table above.
Statistic	Jac Caglianone	Cole Carrigg
G	205	90
PA	785	372
H	181	93
2B	38	22
3B	3	4
HR	30	12
RBI	93	53
BB	51	28
SO	196	89
SB	8	11
AVG	.251	.279
SLG	.436	.477
WAR	2.4	2.6

Jac Caglianone’s full profile →Cole Carrigg’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Jac Caglianone vs

Cole Carrigg vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.