Head to head · 2026 batting

Cole Carrigg vs Zach Neto

In 2026 Zach Neto has been worth 2.1 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Cole Carrigg COL

Zach Neto LAA

2026 batting. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	Cole Carrigg	Zach Neto
G	90	157
PA	372	704
H	93	148
HR	12	27
RBI	53	77
SB	11	24
AVG	.279	.239
OBP	.341	.330
SLG	.477	.436
OPS	.818	.766
ISO	.198	.197
BB%	7.5%	9.9%
K%	23.9%	30.5%
wOBA	.354	.339
wRC+	119	120
WAR	2.6	4.7

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2015 begins at 2015, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the table above.
Statistic	Cole Carrigg	Zach Neto
G	90	522
PA	372	2,189
H	93	477
2B	22	111
3B	4	7
HR	12	85
RBI	53	250
BB	28	162
SO	89	581
SB	11	85
AVG	.279	.244
SLG	.477	.439
WAR	2.6	13.7

Cole Carrigg’s full profile →Zach Neto’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Cole Carrigg vs

Zach Neto vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.