Head to head · 2026 batting

Pete Crow-Armstrong vs Zach Neto

So far in 2026 Pete Crow-Armstrong has been worth 4.0 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Pete Crow-Armstrong CHC

Zach Neto LAA

2026 batting, season in progress. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	Pete Crow-Armstrong	Zach Neto
G	155	150
PA	697	672
H	167	142
HR	44	26
RBI	105	74
SB	37	21
AVG	.277	.239
OBP	.369	.324
SLG	.571	.435
OPS	.941	.760
ISO	.294	.197
BB%	11.2%	9.2%
K%	26.1%	30.8%
wOBA	.401	.335
wRC+	156	117
WAR	8.2	4.2

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2015 begins at 2015, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the table above.
Statistic	Pete Crow-Armstrong	Zach Neto
G	441	515
PA	1,773	2,157
H	401	471
2B	79	109
3B	18	7
HR	85	84
RBI	248	247
BB	131	154
SO	442	573
SB	101	82
AVG	.254	.244
SLG	.488	.439
WAR	13.1	13.2

Pete Crow-Armstrong’s full profile →Zach Neto’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Pete Crow-Armstrong vs

Zach Neto vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.