Head to head · 2026 NLCS pitching
Logan Henderson vs Yoshinobu Yamamoto
In 2026 Yoshinobu Yamamoto has been worth 1.9 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.
- Opponents in the 2026 NLCS, where the Milwaukee Brewers won 4-0 over the Los Angeles Dodgers.
- Their 2026 seasons were among each other's nearest on rate statistics.
- Their 2025 seasons were among each other's nearest on rate statistics.
Postseason
Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.
| Statistic | Logan Henderson | Yoshinobu Yamamoto |
|---|---|---|
| G | 1 | 1 |
| GS | 1 | 1 |
| IP | 4.0 | 2.2 |
| W | 0 | 0 |
| SV | 0 | 0 |
| SO | 2 | 1 |
| BB | 2 | 2 |
| ERA | 4.50 | 10.13 |
| WHIP | 1.25 | 2.25 |
| K/9 | 4.5 | 3.4 |
| BB/9 | 4.5 | 6.8 |
| Statistic | Logan Henderson | Yoshinobu Yamamoto |
|---|---|---|
| G | 3 | 12 |
| GS | 3 | 11 |
| IP | 12.0 | 65.2 |
| W | 0 | 8 |
| SV | 0 | 0 |
| SO | 10 | 59 |
| BB | 6 | 15 |
| ERA | 4.50 | 2.47 |
| WHIP | 1.17 | 0.88 |
| K/9 | 7.5 | 8.1 |
| BB/9 | 4.5 | 2.1 |
2026 season
| Statistic | Logan Henderson | Yoshinobu Yamamoto |
|---|---|---|
| G | 18 | 28 |
| GS | 18 | 28 |
| IP | 98.1 | 185.0 |
| W | 11 | 14 |
| SO | 110 | 182 |
| ERA | 2.47 | 2.53 |
| FIP | 3.33 | 3.34 |
| WHIP | 0.84 | 0.87 |
| K/9 | 10.1 | 8.9 |
| BB/9 | 1.7 | 2.0 |
| FIP− | 80 | 80 |
| WAR | 2.2 | 4.1 |
Career
Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.
| Statistic | Logan Henderson | Yoshinobu Yamamoto |
|---|---|---|
| G | 23 | 76 |
| GS | 23 | 76 |
| IP | 123.2 | 448.2 |
| W | 14 | 33 |
| L | 3 | 19 |
| SV | 0 | 0 |
| SO | 143 | 488 |
| BB | 27 | 123 |
| ERA | 2.33 | 2.61 |
| WHIP | 0.87 | 0.97 |
| K/9 | 10.4 | 9.8 |
| BB/9 | 2.0 | 2.5 |
| HR/9 | 1.2 | 0.8 |
| WAR | 2.8 | 11.4 |
More head to heads
The same seasons, measured against somebody else.
FIP uses the constant solved from this season’s own runs, and FIP− is park-adjusted against the same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.

