DataBaseball
2026

Head to head · 2026 pitching

Parker Messick vs Chris Sale

In 2026 Chris Sale has been worth 0.9 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

2026 season

2026 pitching. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for ERA, FIP, WHIP and walks that is the lower one.
StatisticParker MessickChris Sale
G3227
GS3227
IP186.1162.2
W1214
SO193200
ERA2.562.16
FIP3.072.29
WHIP1.060.98
K/99.311.1
BB/92.41.7
FIP−7355
WAR4.75.6

Postseason

Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.

Every published postseason, pitching, summed with the rates recomputed from the counts.
StatisticParker MessickChris Sale
G413
GS49
IP13.246.2
W01
SV00
SO1766
BB1014
ERA3.955.79
WHIP1.981.33
K/911.212.7
BB/96.62.7

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.

Career pitching totals. ERA, WHIP and the per-nine rates are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; FIP needs each season’s own constant and is left to the season table.
StatisticParker MessickChris Sale
G39420
GS39339
IP226.02,246.2
W15159
L1097
SV012
SO2312,779
BB55518
ERA2.592.95
WHIP1.111.04
K/99.211.1
BB/92.22.1
HR/90.80.9
WAR5.860.0

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

How these are computed

FIP uses the constant solved from this season’s own runs, and FIP− is park-adjusted against the same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.