Head to head · 2026 ALDS batting
Chase DeLauter vs Tristan Peters
In 2026 Tristan Peters has been worth 0.2 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.
Postseason
Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.
| Statistic | Chase DeLauter | Tristan Peters |
|---|---|---|
| G | 5 | 5 |
| PA | 22 | 15 |
| H | 5 | 4 |
| HR | 0 | 0 |
| RBI | 2 | 1 |
| BB | 2 | 1 |
| SO | 0 | 6 |
| SB | 0 | 0 |
| AVG | .250 | .286 |
| OBP | .318 | .333 |
| SLG | .250 | .357 |
| OPS | .568 | .690 |
| Statistic | Chase DeLauter | Tristan Peters |
|---|---|---|
| G | 13 | 7 |
| PA | 55 | 24 |
| H | 14 | 6 |
| HR | 1 | 0 |
| RBI | 6 | 2 |
| BB | 7 | 2 |
| SO | 5 | 8 |
| SB | 0 | 1 |
| AVG | .292 | .286 |
| OBP | .382 | .348 |
| SLG | .417 | .333 |
| OPS | .798 | .681 |
2026 season
| Statistic | Chase DeLauter | Tristan Peters |
|---|---|---|
| G | 133 | 150 |
| PA | 559 | 491 |
| H | 142 | 116 |
| HR | 16 | 12 |
| RBI | 67 | 56 |
| SB | 11 | 8 |
| AVG | .287 | .265 |
| OBP | .363 | .337 |
| SLG | .457 | .437 |
| OPS | .820 | .774 |
| ISO | .170 | .172 |
| BB% | 10.7% | 7.5% |
| K% | 14.7% | 18.3% |
| wOBA | .361 | .342 |
| wRC+ | 128 | 118 |
| WAR | 3.0 | 3.2 |
Career
Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.
| Statistic | Chase DeLauter | Tristan Peters |
|---|---|---|
| G | 133 | 154 |
| PA | 559 | 503 |
| H | 142 | 116 |
| 2B | 30 | 31 |
| 3B | 3 | 4 |
| HR | 16 | 12 |
| RBI | 67 | 56 |
| BB | 60 | 37 |
| SO | 82 | 97 |
| SB | 11 | 8 |
| AVG | .287 | .258 |
| SLG | .457 | .425 |
| WAR | 3.0 | 2.9 |
More head to heads
The same seasons, measured against somebody else.
wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.

