Head to head · 2026 ALDS batting

Travis Bazzana vs Tristan Peters

In 2026 Tristan Peters has been worth 0.5 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Opponents in the 2026 ALDS, where the Cleveland Guardians won 3-2 over the Chicago White Sox.

Travis Bazzana CLE

Tristan Peters CWS

Postseason

Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.

2026 ALDS.
Statistic	Travis Bazzana	Tristan Peters
G	5	5
PA	19	15
H	2	4
HR	0	0
RBI	1	1
BB	3	1
SO	4	6
SB	0	0
AVG	.125	.286
OBP	.263	.333
SLG	.250	.357
OPS	.513	.690

Every published postseason, batting, summed with the rates recomputed from the counts.
Statistic	Travis Bazzana	Tristan Peters
G	11	7
PA	42	24
H	6	6
HR	1	0
RBI	2	2
BB	5	2
SO	8	8
SB	1	1
AVG	.162	.286
OBP	.262	.348
SLG	.297	.333
OPS	.559	.681

2026 season

2026 batting. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	Travis Bazzana	Tristan Peters
G	124	150
PA	517	491
H	110	116
HR	15	12
RBI	57	56
SB	19	8
AVG	.245	.265
OBP	.335	.337
SLG	.408	.437
OPS	.742	.774
ISO	.163	.172
BB%	10.8%	7.5%
K%	20.7%	18.3%
wOBA	.330	.342
wRC+	107	118
WAR	2.7	3.2

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the season table.
Statistic	Travis Bazzana	Tristan Peters
G	124	154
PA	517	503
H	110	116
2B	22	31
3B	3	4
HR	15	12
RBI	57	56
BB	56	37
SO	107	97
SB	19	8
AVG	.245	.258
SLG	.408	.425
WAR	2.7	2.9

Travis Bazzana’s full profile →Tristan Peters’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Travis Bazzana vs

Tristan Peters vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.