Head to head · 2026 batting

Sam Antonacci vs Xavier Edwards

In 2026 the two have been worth the same 3.2 wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Sam Antonacci CWS

Xavier Edwards MIA

2026 batting. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	Sam Antonacci	Xavier Edwards
G	139	140
PA	557	595
H	133	145
HR	8	6
RBI	48	52
SB	20	21
AVG	.277	.280
OBP	.370	.360
SLG	.396	.371
OPS	.766	.730
ISO	.119	.091
BB%	7.7%	11.4%
K%	14.7%	13.9%
wOBA	.348	.329
wRC+	122	110
WAR	3.2	3.2

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2015 begins at 2015, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the table above.
Statistic	Sam Antonacci	Xavier Edwards
G	139	376
PA	557	1,601
H	133	414
2B	25	52
3B	4	16
HR	8	10
RBI	48	124
BB	43	153
SO	82	237
SB	20	84
AVG	.277	.291
SLG	.396	.371
WAR	3.2	9.7

Sam Antonacci’s full profile →Xavier Edwards’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Sam Antonacci vs

Xavier Edwards vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.