Head to head · 2026 ALDS batting

Sam Antonacci vs Travis Bazzana

In 2026 Sam Antonacci has been worth 0.5 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Opponents in the 2026 ALDS, where the Cleveland Guardians won 3-2 over the Chicago White Sox.

Sam Antonacci CWS

Travis Bazzana CLE

Postseason

Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.

2026 ALDS.
Statistic	Sam Antonacci	Travis Bazzana
G	5	5
PA	18	19
H	3	2
HR	0	0
RBI	3	1
BB	1	3
SO	2	4
SB	0	0
AVG	.231	.125
OBP	.389	.263
SLG	.231	.250
OPS	.620	.513

Every published postseason, batting, summed with the rates recomputed from the counts.
Statistic	Sam Antonacci	Travis Bazzana
G	7	11
PA	27	42
H	5	6
HR	0	1
RBI	5	2
BB	2	5
SO	3	8
SB	0	1
AVG	.250	.162
OBP	.407	.262
SLG	.300	.297
OPS	.707	.559

2026 season

2026 batting. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	Sam Antonacci	Travis Bazzana
G	139	124
PA	557	517
H	133	110
HR	8	15
RBI	48	57
SB	20	19
AVG	.277	.245
OBP	.370	.335
SLG	.396	.408
OPS	.766	.742
ISO	.119	.163
BB%	7.7%	10.8%
K%	14.7%	20.7%
wOBA	.348	.330
wRC+	122	107
WAR	3.2	2.7

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the season table.
Statistic	Sam Antonacci	Travis Bazzana
G	139	124
PA	557	517
H	133	110
2B	25	22
3B	4	3
HR	8	15
RBI	48	57
BB	43	56
SO	82	107
SB	20	19
AVG	.277	.245
SLG	.396	.408
WAR	3.2	2.7

Sam Antonacci’s full profile →Travis Bazzana’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Sam Antonacci vs

Travis Bazzana vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.