Head to head · 2026 pitching

Connelly Early vs Tyler Mahle

In 2026 Tyler Mahle has been worth 1.3 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Connelly Early BOS

Tyler Mahle SF

2026 pitching. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for ERA, FIP, WHIP and walks that is the lower one.
Statistic	Connelly Early	Tyler Mahle
G	18	27
GS	18	27
IP	94.2	149.0
W	7	7
SO	94	137
ERA	3.33	3.99
FIP	4.54	4.00
WHIP	1.23	1.23
K/9	8.9	8.3
BB/9	3.2	2.8
FIP−	109	96
WAR	0.8	2.1

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2015 begins at 2015, not at his real first game.

Career pitching totals. ERA, WHIP and the per-nine rates are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; FIP needs each season’s own constant and is left to the table above.
Statistic	Connelly Early	Tyler Mahle
G	22	169
GS	22	168
IP	114.0	884.0
W	8	46
L	7	56
SV	0	0
SO	123	890
BB	38	310
ERA	3.16	4.05
WHIP	1.20	1.28
K/9	9.7	9.1
BB/9	3.0	3.2
HR/9	1.2	1.3
WAR	1.8	12.3

Connelly Early’s full profile →Tyler Mahle’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Connelly Early vs

Tyler Mahle vs

How these are computed

FIP uses the constant solved from this season’s own runs, and FIP− is park-adjusted against the same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.