Head to head · Career batting

Hanley Ramirez vs Mike Trout

In 2019 Mike Trout has been worth 8.3 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Two of the 25 most valuable batting careers on this site, 2005–2026, by dbWAR.

Hanley Ramirez CLE

Mike Trout LAA

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the season table.
Statistic	Hanley Ramirez	Mike Trout
G	1,662	1,788
PA	7,127	7,837
H	1,834	1,878
2B	375	351
3B	32	55
HR	271	426
RBI	917	1,072
BB	660	1,174
SO	1,234	1,828
SB	281	225
AVG	.289	.290
SLG	.486	.558
WAR	51.9	89.9

2019 season

2019 batting. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	Hanley Ramirez	Mike Trout
G	16	134
PA	57	600
H	9	137
HR	2	45
RBI	8	104
SB	0	11
AVG	.184	.291
OBP	.298	.438
SLG	.327	.645
OPS	.625	1.083
ISO	.143	.353
BB%	14.0%	18.3%
K%	29.8%	20.0%
wOBA	.281	.442
wRC+	73	180
WAR	-0.2	8.1

Postseason

Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.

Every published postseason, batting, summed with the rates recomputed from the counts.
Statistic	Hanley Ramirez	Mike Trout
G	20	3
PA	80	15
H	27	1
HR	1	1
RBI	14	1
BB	7	3
SO	13	2
SB	2	0
AVG	.380	.083
OBP	.450	.267
SLG	.577	.333
OPS	1.027	.600

Hanley Ramirez’s full profile →Mike Trout’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Hanley Ramirez vs

Mike Trout vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.