Head to head · 2026 batting

Pete Crow-Armstrong vs Mike Trout

In 2026 Pete Crow-Armstrong has been worth 4.3 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Pete Crow-Armstrong CHC

Mike Trout LAA

2026 batting. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	Pete Crow-Armstrong	Mike Trout
G	162	142
PA	726	634
H	175	124
HR	45	22
RBI	107	54
SB	41	11
AVG	.280	.242
OBP	.372	.382
SLG	.570	.421
OPS	.943	.803
ISO	.291	.179
BB%	11.4%	16.9%
K%	25.8%	26.0%
wOBA	.402	.358
wRC+	157	134
WAR	8.7	4.4

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2015 begins at 2015, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the table above.
Statistic	Pete Crow-Armstrong	Mike Trout
G	448	1,297
PA	1,802	5,642
H	409	1,306
2B	81	240
3B	18	29
HR	86	328
RBI	250	765
BB	136	905
SO	447	1,339
SB	105	123
AVG	.255	.283
SLG	.489	.562
WAR	13.6	63.8

Pete Crow-Armstrong’s full profile →Mike Trout’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Pete Crow-Armstrong vs

Mike Trout vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.