Head to head · 2026 Wild Card Series batting
Jose Altuve vs Sam Antonacci
In 2026 Sam Antonacci has been worth 1.7 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.
Postseason
Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.
| Statistic | Jose Altuve | Sam Antonacci |
|---|---|---|
| G | 2 | 2 |
| PA | 8 | 9 |
| H | 2 | 2 |
| HR | 1 | 0 |
| RBI | 1 | 2 |
| BB | 0 | 1 |
| SO | 1 | 1 |
| SB | 0 | 0 |
| AVG | .250 | .286 |
| OBP | .250 | .444 |
| SLG | .625 | .429 |
| OPS | .875 | .873 |
| Statistic | Jose Altuve | Sam Antonacci |
|---|---|---|
| G | 107 | 7 |
| PA | 492 | 27 |
| H | 120 | 5 |
| HR | 28 | 0 |
| RBI | 57 | 5 |
| BB | 43 | 2 |
| SO | 76 | 3 |
| SB | 9 | 0 |
| AVG | .270 | .250 |
| OBP | .335 | .407 |
| SLG | .507 | .300 |
| OPS | .842 | .707 |
2026 season
| Statistic | Jose Altuve | Sam Antonacci |
|---|---|---|
| G | 135 | 139 |
| PA | 573 | 557 |
| H | 131 | 133 |
| HR | 16 | 8 |
| RBI | 50 | 48 |
| SB | 5 | 20 |
| AVG | .250 | .277 |
| OBP | .306 | .370 |
| SLG | .395 | .396 |
| OPS | .701 | .766 |
| ISO | .145 | .119 |
| BB% | 7.2% | 7.7% |
| K% | 19.9% | 14.7% |
| wOBA | .309 | .348 |
| wRC+ | 96 | 122 |
| WAR | 1.5 | 3.2 |
Career
Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.
| Statistic | Jose Altuve | Sam Antonacci |
|---|---|---|
| G | 2,109 | 139 |
| PA | 9,269 | 557 |
| H | 2,519 | 133 |
| 2B | 479 | 25 |
| 3B | 34 | 4 |
| HR | 271 | 8 |
| RBI | 939 | 48 |
| BB | 696 | 43 |
| SO | 1,253 | 82 |
| SB | 330 | 20 |
| AVG | .300 | .277 |
| SLG | .462 | .396 |
| WAR | 64.2 | 3.2 |
More head to heads
The same seasons, measured against somebody else.
wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.

