Head to head · 2026 NLDS batting

Freddie Freeman vs Michael Harris II

In 2026 Michael Harris II has been worth 1.6 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Opponents in the 2026 NLDS, where the Los Angeles Dodgers won 3-1 over the Atlanta Braves.

Freddie Freeman LAD

Michael Harris II ATL

Postseason

Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.

2026 NLDS.
Statistic	Freddie Freeman	Michael Harris II
G	4	4
PA	17	17
H	4	6
HR	2	0
RBI	2	1
BB	2	1
SO	2	2
SB	0	1
AVG	.267	.375
OBP	.353	.412
SLG	.667	.625
OPS	1.020	1.037

Every published postseason, batting, summed with the rates recomputed from the counts.
Statistic	Freddie Freeman	Michael Harris II
G	87	17
PA	381	65
H	84	17
HR	18	2
RBI	42	7
BB	45	1
SO	71	10
SB	4	2
AVG	.256	.274
OBP	.354	.297
SLG	.479	.452
OPS	.833	.748

2026 season

2026 batting. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	Freddie Freeman	Michael Harris II
G	153	155
PA	657	621
H	167	174
HR	16	26
RBI	70	87
SB	7	12
AVG	.288	.294
OBP	.362	.321
SLG	.430	.491
OPS	.792	.812
ISO	.142	.196
BB%	10.0%	3.7%
K%	17.7%	19.2%
wOBA	.350	.350
wRC+	123	120
WAR	2.8	4.4

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the season table.
Statistic	Freddie Freeman	Michael Harris II
G	2,323	676
PA	10,020	2,712
H	2,598	713
2B	579	136
3B	34	16
HR	383	99
RBI	1,392	342
BB	1,136	108
SO	1,879	549
SB	111	82
AVG	.299	.278
SLG	.505	.460
WAR	70.6	16.3

Freddie Freeman’s full profile →Michael Harris II’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Freddie Freeman vs

Michael Harris II vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.