Head to head · 2026 NLDS batting
Michael Harris II vs Andy Pages
In 2026 Michael Harris II has been worth 0.5 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.
Postseason
Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.
| Statistic | Michael Harris II | Andy Pages |
|---|---|---|
| G | 4 | 4 |
| PA | 17 | 15 |
| H | 6 | 4 |
| HR | 0 | 0 |
| RBI | 1 | 2 |
| BB | 1 | 1 |
| SO | 2 | 5 |
| SB | 1 | 0 |
| AVG | .375 | .286 |
| OBP | .412 | .333 |
| SLG | .625 | .286 |
| OPS | 1.037 | .619 |
| Statistic | Michael Harris II | Andy Pages |
|---|---|---|
| G | 17 | 28 |
| PA | 65 | 103 |
| H | 17 | 15 |
| HR | 2 | 2 |
| RBI | 7 | 9 |
| BB | 1 | 2 |
| SO | 10 | 26 |
| SB | 2 | 0 |
| AVG | .274 | .156 |
| OBP | .297 | .198 |
| SLG | .452 | .240 |
| OPS | .748 | .438 |
2026 season
| Statistic | Michael Harris II | Andy Pages |
|---|---|---|
| G | 155 | 133 |
| PA | 621 | 574 |
| H | 174 | 140 |
| HR | 26 | 23 |
| RBI | 87 | 85 |
| SB | 12 | 13 |
| AVG | .294 | .274 |
| OBP | .321 | .343 |
| SLG | .491 | .468 |
| OPS | .812 | .811 |
| ISO | .196 | .194 |
| BB% | 3.7% | 8.5% |
| K% | 19.2% | 19.7% |
| wOBA | .350 | .354 |
| wRC+ | 120 | 125 |
| WAR | 4.4 | 3.9 |
Career
Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.
| Statistic | Michael Harris II | Andy Pages |
|---|---|---|
| G | 676 | 403 |
| PA | 2,712 | 1,641 |
| H | 713 | 398 |
| 2B | 136 | 76 |
| 3B | 16 | 4 |
| HR | 99 | 63 |
| RBI | 342 | 217 |
| BB | 108 | 107 |
| SO | 549 | 356 |
| SB | 82 | 28 |
| AVG | .278 | .266 |
| SLG | .460 | .449 |
| WAR | 16.3 | 8.0 |
More head to heads
The same seasons, measured against somebody else.
wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.

